1099 Independent Contractor Article by Tim Twigg and R. Crane
Playing the independent contractor game – not!
Independent Contractor Article by Tim Twigg and Rebecca Crane
It all starts innocently enough. You are looking to add an associate, hygienist, or dental assistant but don’t want to hire until you become convinced they are going to “work out.” So, you set the individual up as an independent contractor to avoid (you think) the taxes, paperwork, labor laws, and other challenges associated with this person being an employee.
Sounds simple enough in theory — not so, though, in real life. Like it or not, governments ideally want all workers to be employees. Why? That’s easy — more taxes. As such, the criteria for determining employee vs. independent contractor status are stacked in favor of workers being employees.
Bottom line: the overwhelming majority (in excess of 95%) of dental office employees do not meet the criteria to qualify as independent contractors. We find throughout dentistry that misunderstandings and misinformation abound on this matter. Using the information below will help you better understand and more successfully navigate the inherent risks.
Here is a good rule to follow: If the practice/business controls not only the results to be achieved, but also the means used in achieving the result, an employer/employee relationship exists, rather than an independent contractor relationship.
The relevant issues used to specifically determine an individual’s status are: behavioral control, financial control, and the relationship of the parties.
Under the category of behavioral control, the IRS considers facts that demonstrate whether the business has maintained the right to direct and control how a worker performs the tasks for which he or she is engaged. The factors specifically considered under this category include the type and degree of instruction and the training provided to the worker.
Employees are generally subject to instructions about when, where, and how to work. Independent contractors are not. In analyzing the degree and type of instruction, the IRS considers whether the worker receives instructions regarding:
Which tools or equipment to use
Which workers to hire or assist in performing work
Where to purchase supplies and services
What work must be performed by a specific individual
The order or sequence to follow in completing the work
The key consideration is whether the business has retained the right to control the details of a worker’s performance or, in the alternative, whether it has given up that right.
Under the financial control category, the IRS considers “[f]acts that show whether the business has a right to control the financial and business aspects of the worker’s job,” including:
The extent to which the worker has incurred unreimbursed business expenses
The extent of the worker’s investment
The extent to which the worker makes his or her services available to the relevant market
The manner in which the business pays the worker
The extent to which the worker can realize a profit or incur a loss
Type of relationship
Factors considered with respect to the nature of the parties’ relationship include:
Whether a written contract describes the relationship that they intended to create
Whether the business provides the worker with employee-type benefits, such as insurance, a pension plan, vacation pay, or sick pay
The permanency of the relationship
The extent to which services performed by the worker are a key aspect of the regular business of the company
When workers are provided through a contractual arrangement with a staffing firm, it is essential that the agreement between the employer and the staffing agency be carefully reviewed to ensure the staffing agency is considered the primary employer. In such a case, you would pay the staffing agency a fee and the staffing agency would pay the employee. Thus, you could consider the temporary help an independent contractor. If, however, you are paying the temporary help directly and you only paid the staffing agency a “headhunter’s fee,” then the temporary help cannot be considered an independent contractor. He or she must be treated as a regular staff member (i.e., taxes, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, etc.).
If you have independent contractor workers, review the arrangements carefully in consultation with your labor regulations consultant and/or legal counsel to avoid becoming an enforcement statistic.
Tim Twigg is the president of Bent Ericksen & Associates, and Rebecca Crane is a human resource compliance consultant with Bent Ericksen & Associates. For 30 years, the company has been a leading authority in human resource and personnel issues, helping dentists successfully deal with the ever-changing and complex labor laws. To receive a complimentary copy of the company’s quarterly newsletter or to learn more about its services, call (800) 679-2760 or visit the website at www.bentericksen.com.